CMHC's new snapshot of Canadian housing

CMHC's new snapshot of Canadian housing

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. (CMHC) recently released its annual state of the nation report on housing. The 2007 Canadian Housing Observer says building greener homes in higher-density neighbourhoods near public transit, rather than in sprawling suburbs, is key to reducing the housing sector's impact on the environment and lowering greenhouse gas emissions.

The 2007 Canadian Housing Observer analyzes the relationship between environment-friendly housing construction, neighbourhood design and transportation. It found that downtown living, which provides easy access to workplaces, schools, and shops, as well as housing located close to public transit, lead to reduced automobile use. Also, better design of the suburbs results in less short-distance driving and lower greenhouse gas emissions.

The 2007 Canadian Housing Observer also examines recent trends in affordable housing, housing finance and market developments. A key conclusion about the living conditions of Canadians, which is based on new CMHC information, found that the level of Canadians living in core housing need has declined slightly from 13.9 per cent in 2002 to 13.6 per cent in 2004. Core housing need is defined as "Households which occupy housing that falls below dwelling adequacy, suitability or affordability standards, and which spends 30 per cent or more of their before-tax income for the median rent of alternative local market housing that meets all three standards."

Other key findings of this year's Canadian Housing Observer include:
- Housing-related spending grew by 6.1 per cent in 2006, contributing more than $275 billion to the Canadian economy;
- Total mortgage credit outstanding in 2006 reached an annual average of $694 billion, up 10.7 per cent from 2005. This is mainly due to increased property values, which in turn increased the average mortgage amount approved;
- All of the fastest-growing metropolitan areas in recent years were in Alberta, Ontario and British Columbia, with the exceptions of Moncton, N.B. and Sherbrooke, Québec.
- Canada's population grew at a slightly faster pace in recent years than in the late 1990s mainly due to increased immigration. Senior, immigrant and Aboriginal groups are growing more rapidly than the general population. From 2001 to 2006, the vast majority (86 per cent) of population growth took place in metropolitan areas.
- The number of households in Canada owning second homes, vacation homes, or cottages reached 1.1 million in 2005, about 200,000 more than in 1999. From 1990 to 2004, high-income earners enjoyed much stronger income growth than those with low incomes. From 1999 to 2005, the average net worth of households in Canada, after adjusting for inflation, grew at an annual rate of more than four per cent. Increased equity in real estate played a major role in this increase.
- In 2006, the proportion of gross domestic product spent on housing increased to 19.1 per cent compared to 18.9 per cent the previous year.
- Total spending on housing renovations, repair and maintenance reached $43.9 billion in 2006, an increase of nine per
cent compared to 2005.
- From a record low of 5.99 per cent in 2005, mortgage rates rose to an average posted rate of 6.66 per cent for a five-year term mortgage in 2006. They were still low by historical standards. CMHC's 2006 Mortgage Consumer Survey found that the majority of mortgage consumers (84 per cent) were satisfied with the services they received when negotiating their current mortgage. About 70 per cent of mortgage consumers prefer to use one of the major lending institutions to obtain a mortgage.
- Urban households in British Columbia and Ontario continued to experience a high level of core housing need between 2002 and 2004. One-person households accounted for almost half (46.7 per cent) of Canadian urban households in core housing need, up from 43.7 per cent in 2002. The incidence of core housing need among senior-led urban households declined from 15.4 per cent in 2002 to 13.9 per cent in 2004. The percentage of immigrant urban tenant households in core housing need increased to 36.3 per cent in 2004 from 34.4 per cent in 2002.
- The 20 per cent of households having the lowest incomes accounted for about 81 per cent of all urban households in core housing need in 2004, up from about 78 per cent in 2002. Courtesy of R.Paul Chadwick TD/CT

Search the MLS or read more about Interest Rates, Power of Sale Properties, Price Trends and more at my website.

Thank you for reading my blog and if there is anything else I can help you with please don't hesitate to contact me,

Mark

A. Mark Argentino
P. Eng. Broker
Specializing in Residential & Investment Real Estate

Thinking of Selling? Best Mortgage Rates Current Home Prices Search MLS
RE/MAX Realty Specialists Inc.

Providing Full-Time Professional Real Estate Services since 1987
( BUS 905-828-3434
2 FAX 905-828-2829 ÈCELL 416-520-1577
› E-MAIL : mark@mississauga4sale.com
8 Website : Mississauga4Sale.com

• Thinking of selling in the next 3 to 6 months? Would you like a Complimentary & Quick Over-The-Net Home Evaluation ?
• On-Line Real Estate Newsletter sign up
• See seasonal housing patterns

Title insurance policies and content can differ widely

Title insurance policies and content can differ widely

Are all title insurance policies the same? Are the coverages provided by the various title insurance companies so similar that it doesn't matter which one you choose?

These questions arise in the wake of a recent article on title insurance which appeared in the Aug. 18 New in Homes. The article quoted Toronto real estate lawyer Bruce McKenna, and Mississauga lawyer Lorne Shuman, who works for First Canadian Title.

"Both Shuman and McKenna suggest purchasers go with the insurance provider recommended by their lawyer," the article said, adding that "while there are small differences between providers, your lawyer will be working with the provider he or she feels is best for you."

McKenna is also quoted as saying that, "basically, the coverages are so similar and the market pressures to deal with claims in a reasonable way are so large that I don't feel the insurer matters very much."

I have to differ, but in doing so I should first point out in fairness that I am an elected bencher (director) of the Law Society of Upper Canada, which owns the Lawyers Professional Indemnity Company (LawPRO). That company insures all Ontario lawyers for errors and omissions, and also owns TitlePLUS, one of several licensed title insurance companies in Ontario.

In my capacity as a Law Society bencher, my legal duty is to assist in governing Ontario lawyers in the public interest. I am not, however, a cheerleader for the Law Society.

I have no role in the operations of LawPRO or TitlePLUS except to approve or not approve their annual reports, along with more than 50 other bencher colleagues. I do not sit on the board of LawPRO and do not attend its meetings.

Having said that, I feel compelled to explain that there is, in my opinion, a significant difference among title insurers. Conventional title insurance policies cover a lawyer's negligence only if the mistake relates to a loss that is listed in the policy as an insured risk.

In contrast, only TitlePLUS routinely makes available comprehensive coverage for the legal services provided by a lawyer, in addition to the listed risks. In other words, any negligence by a lawyer in a real estate transaction is covered by a TitlePLUS policy, whether or not the mistake is an insured risk set out in the policy.

What this means is that in a real estate transaction, if a lawyer makes an error amounting to negligence, the legal services coverage in a TitlePLUS policy protects the homeowner, even if the lawyer's mistake is not related to one of the itemized title risks insured by the policy.

One example of legal services coverage occurred when the buyer of a condo unit told her lawyer she wanted to pay cash, but wound up getting stuck with paying interest on a vendor-take-back mortgage during the interim occupancy period. The legal services provision in the TitlePLUS policy compensated the buyer for her $9,000 loss – even though the policy did not specifically insure against this type of loss.

Without the coverage, the client would have had to sue the lawyer for the loss.

The Aug. 18 article also quotes Lorne Shuman as saying that title insurance costs about $299 for a house purchase with a mortgage, but it varies with properties and price range.

In fact, there is a significant difference in the cost of residential title insurance policies among three companies that I called last week. For a resale house selling at between $200,000 and $500,000, with one institutional mortgage, First Canadian Title (FCT) quoted $322.92. Stewart Title Guaranty Company (STG) quoted $351, and TitlePLUS (TP) quoted $238.80 including the legal services coverage.

For new homes, the premiums drop to $268.92 (FCT), $324 (STG), and $233.10 (TP). In both of these types of policies, Stewart Title rebates a fee of $100 to qualified lawyers who arrange coverage over the Internet. The fee must be disclosed to the lawyer's client.

For resale condominium units in the same price range, the premiums are $193.32 (FCT), $189 (STG) and $184.80 (TP).

Whenever I can, I use TitlePLUS policies for purchaser clients. The cost is lower, and the coverage is – in my opinion – far superior.
by: Bob Aaron from the Toronto Star

Read More about Title Insurance

Search the MLS or read more about Interest Rates, Power of Sale Properties, Price Trends and more at my website.

Thank you for reading my blog and if there is anything else I can help you with please don't hesitate to contact me,

Mark

A. Mark Argentino
P. Eng. Broker
Specializing in Residential & Investment Real Estate

Thinking of Selling? Best Mortgage Rates Current Home Prices Search MLS
RE/MAX Realty Specialists Inc.

Providing Full-Time Professional Real Estate Services since 1987
( BUS 905-828-3434
2 FAX 905-828-2829 ÈCELL 416-520-1577
› E-MAIL : mark@mississauga4sale.com
8 Website : Mississauga4Sale.com

• Thinking of selling in the next 3 to 6 months? Would you like a Complimentary & Quick Over-The-Net Home Evaluation ?
• On-Line Real Estate Newsletter sign up
• See seasonal housing patterns

New Section about Power of Sales, Foreclosures and Quit Claim Deeds in this section

I've recently added a New Power of Sale section to my website that will show you the pitfalls to avoid and the clauses to put into your offer when you buy a Power of Sale property in Ontario. This new section will also explain Power of Sale and Foreclosure in detail. Read more here.


You will become educated about Power of Sales, Foreclosures and Quit Claim Deeds in this section.

You will learn the pitfalls to avoid, the clauses you could expect to see in an offer and read about the special clauses you can insert into your offer when you buy a Power of Sale Property. I will also explain the remedies open to sellers of these types of properties and how this affects you.

Power of Sales, Foreclosures and Quit Claim Deeds in this section.



For more information please contact A. Mark Argentino

A. Mark Argentino, Broker, P.Eng.,
Specializing in Residential & Investment Real Estate
RE/MAX Realty Specialists Inc., Brokerage
2691 Credit Valley Road, Suite 101, Mississauga, Ontario L5M 7A1

BUS. 905-828-3434
FAX. 905-828-2829
E-MAIL: mark@mississauga4sale.com
Website: Mississauga4Sale.com

Tax Sale Properties in Ontario - How can you find them?

Example of the procedure of selling a tax sale property

Before there is a sale of property for tax arrears the property owner is given every opportunity to pay the taxes in full in order to keep possession of their property. This right has been supported by the Ontario Court of Appeal.

As the City or Municipality is only interested in recovering the debt outstanding, they typically adhere to the principal that the owner is given all chances to bring the taxes up to date and where an arrangement to pay has been made between the owner and the city, the tax sale of an advertised property will be cancelled.

Sometimes a tax sale does not occur, nobody bids on a property and the property becomes vested with the city or Municipality. Reasons for this can be where there are no bids during the tax sale and the property becomes vested with the city. Some of the reasons for this include but are not limited to:

• there is an easement on the land and building on it is restricted,


• the property is so small that building on it would not be allowed,


• the property is land locked and not accessible,


• the zoning of the land limits its use,


• the property is in such disrepair that it is not worth the taxes owed, etc.

In these situations with the exception of the last example the city or municipality may try and identify any restrictions so that bidders are fully aware before they bid and commit their 20% deposit which will be forfeited should the bidder not close the sale.

Where the tax sale has no bids, the City has one year from a failed tax sale to decide whether the City wants to vest the property to itself. If there are any concerns as to contamination or the safety of a building structure then the city will analyze the available data to decide if the city should assume any risk in putting the property in the City's name.

Where it is determined that the City will not vest the property they may issue a Request for Offers and attempt to spur development by accepting much less than the taxes owed while limiting our risk of ownership to a very short period. Examples of these types of properties are where the taxes owed are much more than the assessed value. The City can also choose to do nothing with the property and then start the whole tax process again on that property.

Where a property did get sold at the tax sale the price bid for that property must be at least the taxes owing (minimum bid). Where the bid was for more than the taxes owing the balance is paid into Provincial Court and any other creditors that were registered on title can then make a claim for the excess funds.

On properties for which there is no bid and it is indicated that the property is vested to the City, usually the Real Estate Department becomes responsible for the property. They will work with transferring title to any adjoining owners, transferring title to another government agency (i.e. conservation, authority), the city may potentially require the property for its own use, or the Real Estate Department may market the property and attempt to then get the best price available for the property. Often the city or municipality will market the property on the MLS. These properties are then available to the general public through agents like myself.

I can send you a list of foreclosure properties if you use my online form.

As you can see, the process can become quite complicated and may take many months or years to conclude.


For more information please contact A. Mark Argentino

A. Mark Argentino, Broker, P.Eng.,
Specializing in Residential & Investment Real Estate
RE/MAX Realty Specialists Inc., Brokerage
2691 Credit Valley Road, Suite 101, Mississauga, Ontario L5M 7A1

BUS. 905-828-3434
FAX. 905-828-2829
E-MAIL: mark@mississauga4sale.com
Website: Mississauga4Sale.com